Sunday 5 May 2013

Is the current srilanka was the actual Ravana's lanka?

The challenge in understanding the events of ramayana is the timeline of treta yuga. 125,000 is such a big number for any kind of investigation. But the actual fact is that we need to understand the geographical conditions during this period.

100,000 yrs ago, our map looked like this:



As I have described in the previousd post, there were 2 species of humans, the homo sapiens (man), the Neanderthals (probably vanaras). But if we have a closer look in the shape of India, the current Srilanka and India belongs to the same land mass. This contradicts the idea of Adams Bridge as Ramas Bridge, Rameshwaram where Rama worshipped Shiva or the Lanka ruled by Ravana as there is no separation between Srilanka and India.

This leads to few more questions:

Assuming Ramayana is true,
1. Are the dates of yugas calculated are correct?
2. Or whether the Srilanka that we see isthe actual lanka?
3. Or Is it the australasia continent that was closer during 100000 yrs ago was the actual srilanka?

Questions remain unanswered.....

No comments:

Post a Comment